Friday 31 October 2008

Indoor Floodlight Lightbulb - compact fluorescent


"the Amazon description says nothing about this..."



When I bought 6 Jan 2011 the description said:



"SYLVANIA 65-Watt 130-Volt BR30 Indoor Flood, 6-Pack Consumer Value Pack # 65BR30 CVP 6PK"

"Voltage: 130 volts"



I _AGREE_ that Amazon should SHOUT that these are 130V lamps, AND that they will be LESS-BRIGHT and LAST LONGER when used on common 115V-125V supply.



But 130V incandescent lamps ARE a common practice for certain situations.



130V lamps on 120V power last 2.5 times longer!!



As a rough guide: if incandescent lamp replacement costs (salary, ladder, downtime) are more than the bulb, you will probably save money by using the next higher voltage bulb.



"for houses that don't exist (who has 130 volt lines?)"



Many-many homes now get 125V power. I have 124V. Standard 120V-design lamps burn bright and die early.



"...for houses that do exist they'll be dimmer than the advertised 65w."



Yes, although "65W" is not the light, it is the power consumed at nominal 130V voltage. Both power and light will be less at 120V, but life will be longer.



The Sylvania box is quite clear:



Performance === at 130V = at 120V

Watts actual: ===== 65 ----- 57

Lumens (light): === 640 ---- 470

Lifetime avg: ==== 2000 --- 5000



Yes, 73% as much light for 88% as much electric bill, but _250%_ as much life!



When replacement cost is small, such as home undercounter lights, 130V lamps are a bad buy.



When line-voltage is near 125V (which is very common), 120V lamps have short life, 130V lamps may be a better balance of life and light.



When replacement cost is large, when you have to pay a worker to go up a ladder, the reduced replacement labor costs can often justify the extra lights and power required to get a specific light level. Schools and factories often specify 130V because of high labor costs.



Suppose I want 12 foot-candles all over my 2-car garage. I need 5700 lumens. I can use nine 120@120 lamps or twelve 130@120 lamps.



I compute cost for a full year 24/7 (2.4 hours/day for 10 years will be similar). Each of the nine 120@120 sockets will eat 4.4 bulbs. Each of the twelve 130@120 sockets will eat only 1.8 bulbs.



The nine 65W (120@120) consume 582 Watts. The twelve 57W (130@120) consume 684 Watts.



rating: === 120@120 ----- 130@120

bulbs ======= $200 ---------$110 (at $5/bulb)

power: ====== $770 -------- $900 (at $0.15/KWh)

total: ======= $970 ------ $1,100

difference: ---------------- +$130 (130@120V eats more power for the same light)

bulb changes == 40 ----------- 22 (130@120V lasts longer for the same light)



$130 more operating cost but 18 fewer lamp-changes. If a bulb-change costs over $7.22 (labor or inconvenience), the 130V bulbs are cheaper total operating cost.



If your actual voltage is closer to 125V, then 130V bulbs may make sense even at $3/change costs.



In a kitchen, use the 120v bulbs. In my 124V garage I need the long ladder to reach the ceiling, and I'd rather do that less often. Sylvania 15172 65-Watt 130-Volt BR30 Indoor Flood, 6 Pack

Instead of having to drive to Home Depot and waste gas, make a line, and pay sales tax, these light bulbs were delivered free and at a better price. They work just as you would expect from a light bulb.

Have used only one in our kitchen. Bright white light. Will replace our older regular floods with these when they burn out unless the comparison causes us to move sooner. Sorry about the other reviewer. This is a great light.

Received the shipment and all the bulbs are working. One thing I noticed though, Amazon has increased the price from 14.99 to 20.99. It is interesting to see such a fluctuation in price in such a short time (it has been less than a month).

I was a bit wary of ordering these bulbs considering the reviews of people getting bad bulbs, but the price was too good to pass up and I needed a bunch. I ordered 3 cases and have used 9 bulbs from 2 of the cases and every single bulb worked fine. I'm also not sure why the fuss about 130V since my understanding is that this will only translate into a slightly lower actual wattage, but longer life. Anyways from a practical standpoint, when I replaced the bulbs they were just as bright as the other bulbs we have. I'm glad I took the chance and will definitely order again when I need more bulbs. Also, Amazon packaged them very well with a lot of air-packing and not a single bulb was broken!

I bought a case of 12 of these about a year ago because we have 8 can lights in the kitchen and four of the previous Verilux bulbs all seemed to need replacing at once. Well, we have gone through eleven of these in one year! We replaced those four Verilux right away, and then over the next year replaced the four other Verilux and three of these Sylvanias. I came down this morning (it's a grey day here in Seattle) and when I turned on the light the kitchen looked kind of gloomy. Three more Sylvanias have burned out! And it was February of 2010 when I bought them. This is not what I consider a good life for a light bulb (bulbs we put in our pendant lamps in 2007 are still going strong) so I'm on the hunt for a different bulb.

The box states clearly on the front "Notice: This product is designed for 130 volts. When used on the normal line voltage of 120 volts, bulb life is noticeably increased but the efficiency and light output are reduced." So the spec'ed rating is for houses that don't exist (who has 130 volt lines?) and for houses that do exist they'll be dimmer than the advertised 65w. Not sure how many stars to give it -- the box is very clear, but the Amazon description says nothing about this (that I could see) - Compact Fluorescent'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


    ,
  • compact fluorescent

fitness ball - fitness ball


I purchased this 6# medicine ball for my daughter - hoping she would use. Sofar she hasn't, but the quality of the ball is very good and I would purchase it again. This Medicine Ball came in a very handy Black Black Mesh Carry Sack - Weight: 6 lbs by Agile Fitness. Once again, I was pleased with Amazon quality of service. 6LB Blue Medicine Ball in Black Mesh Carry Sack - Fitness Ball'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


    ,
  • fitness ball

Photo Printer - pro 9000, photo printer


I Just got this printer from Adorama today (via UPS) and this thing is incredible. Im a professional photographer and this printer prints lab qaulity prints super fast. I made sure I used Photoshop to print some test pictures )4x6 on Canon Photo Plus Semi Gloss and it matched exactly what was on my screen. As a matter of fact the prints look better than whats on my screen...I had to do a double take. I no longer will be using the lab to order prints for my clients (only wedding books), Im printing them all myself. The speed is also amazing. The only thing I dont like thus far is the noise of the print head when the printer starts up and before prints start printing. When the picture prints its pretty quiet though. I will update my review after about a week after i dump a few hundred more prints for my clients.



***** Update #1 ***** : Ok Now I've had this printer a few weeks and I've printed a few hundred pictures in a variety of sizes (4x6, 5x7 , 8.5x11 and 13x19) and this is a must have printer for those wanting to print their own professional lab (and better than lab quality) photos. This bad boy is very fast and the print quality is just absolutely superb (I use Canon Photo Paper Plus Glossy , Ilford Galerie Smooth Pearl, Ilford Galerie Smooth Gloss Paper and Ilfor Printasia 13x19 paper and Canon Photo Paper Plus Glossy II 13x19). I've shown my photographs to a variety of clients, potential clients, freinds and family and they are blown away by the quality of the prints. When I tell them I printed them myself they are like "What?, No way" and then they asume I must have spent a whole lot of money on the printer...which is wrong ([...] after rebate from amazon/adorama).



Pros :



Fast - This printer spits out a vibrant and full of color 13x19 glossy print in under 3 minutes 30 seconds.



[...]



Quiet - I can print at all hours of the night and not worry about waking anyone up. When Im in the next room with the door open the printer prints so quiet I cant even hear it and have to come check on the print job to make sure it didnt crash since I cant hear any noise in the next room..lol



Quality - Prints professional quality prints on a variety of papers in many different sizes.



Paper - You ARE NOT limited to Canon papers as you can use a bunch of other manufacturers papers. My Favorite thus far is Ilford (cheap from amazon and is basically identical to expensive Canon paper).



Ink Usuage - Good on ink, Not really an ink guzzler. I printed dozens and dozens of 4x6's and even a bunch of 8x11's and 13x19s and the ink kept going and going, until I finaly started running low (after many prints had been printed). Also I now use The Continuous Ink System , so ink is now dirt cheap. Costs something link [...] per cartridge (estimated - all I know is I pay [...] for and 8 pack of about 880 ml's of ink which is over 80 cartridges (no joke, visit fleabay and youll see tons of them)...Save money and Dont buy Canon Ink Carts and you will save at least 50% right off the bat).



Cons :



B&W printing - Prints mediocre black and white prints. This is no secret and I knew this before I bought it. I dont care about black and white prints just color so its all good for me.



Size - This is a big mamma-jamma. You will have to dedicate a space to this thing because of its width.



CD Printing - The US version of this printer does not print to CD's at all and there are no hacks that enable the CD printing feature (Like with the Pixma Pro 9000). If you need CD printing, just print to photo quality CD labels.



Overal: This is a fantastic buy. If you need professional quality color prints done in house you will surely love this printer. Canon outdid itself with this model... The price is steadily falling too. Especially after the [...] rebate.



***** Update #2 ******



DO NOT USE OR BUY THE CONTINUOUS INK SYSTEM FROM SUPERjetUSA With THIS PRINTER:



I bought the continuous ink system from superjetUSA off ebay and it worked fine for a short while and then it leaked ink all inside my printer. All 800+ml's. It was a huge mess and it caused me to use many hours of my valuable time and waste dozens and dozens and dozens of pieces of plain paper/photo paper to clean out the leaking mess. Then SuperjetUSA refused to give me my money back and kept telling me to do this and that and email them pictures of the mess. It took me weeks to clean it up and there is a still an ink mess in my printer. ONLY USE INK CARTRIDGES (stay away from the Continuous ink system) FROM A GOOD SOURCE. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.



I've had this printer for months and it continues to be an awesome printer. No complaints. I made almost the entire printer purchase price of the printer back within only a few weeks of having the printer..thats how good the prints are.. THE CANON PIXMA 9000 MKII is an awesome investment. Canon PIXMA Pro9000 Mark II Inkjet Photo Printer (3295B002)

This is a truly wonderful printer. The prints are amazingly crisp and accurate and vibrant. If you can imagine it, capture it, see it: This printer will print it for you. What I see on my LCD computer screen is what I get on the print. Extremely easy to install and use. If you just want to crank out a bunch of 4X6s for your family or print large art prints, this printer does it with ease: The "make prints of photos" software function makes this a breeze. It leads you through easy steps to making your prints and shows you images all along of what you are planning to print (instant previews all the way through) until you finally commit the "print" button. I love this SW. It's quiet. It can take a large stack of photo paper so you can select what you want to print and walk away.



The print quality is astonishing. It's just as good as anything you'll get from a photo lab. And at the price of this printer?! Amazing. I haven't made 13X19s yet (that paper is on the way) but everything I've printed has knocked my socks off. This printer opens up whole new avenues for my photography. I alsways looked forward to someday having a color darkroom. Well, now I have it, without all the space used, the chemicals stinking and going bad in their bottles, and BETTER print no-fade life.



[Update 11-Aug-2009: I've made several 13X19 prints now and they are luscious. Just eye-popping. It makes you want to just print off all your favorite shots at 13X19 RIGHT NOW! But what would I do with them all ... Bottom line: Print quality knocks your socks off. Everyone to whom I've shown the 13X19s has been suitably impressed. They clearly show the limitations of the film/sensor and lenses, not the printer. Wow.]



The only negative on this printer would be size: It's big. But, I don't really see how they could have made it much smaller, since it accommodates 13X19 inch paper(!) It has all sorts of clever panels that fold open when you need them to print larger papers, etc., and they fold away to keep the overall size smaller, unless you need them. For all the paper sizes I am using: 4X6, 5X7, 8.5X11, and 13X19, the paper hopper is the vertical one, which means the footprint required by the printer is much smaller than would be required by a horizontal paper feed. It's also much easier to access and load than horizontal feed would be. Nicely engineered and thought-out.



I have been mostly using the premium Canon glossy paper (well worth it) but also some Kodak glossy paper. All results are excellent. Here are the papers I've been mainly using:

Canon Glossy II 4 x 6 Inch Photo Paper Plus Glossy 400 Sheets (2311B031)

Canon Photo Paper Plus Glossy II 8.5in x 11in 20 Sheets (2311B001)

Canon Glossy II 13 x 19 Inch Photo Paper Plus Glossy 20 Sheets (2311B026)



I love this printer! Best thing I've bought for photography since my first digital SLR.



My computer: Dell Dimension 2400, 2GB RAM, Windows XP Professional



[Update 11-Sep-09:] I wondered a little whether this printer would do as well with documents put together in MSWord, Publisher, etc. Good news: The results are just as good. Wonderful printer.



[Update 1-Oct-2010:] I have been using this printer for a long time now. I've gone through at least 2000 prints (no kidding) and I continue to love this printer. It is honestly amazing (much better than photo processes. One of the beauties of digital is that you only have ONE LENS to worry about. After capture, exactly what the CCD records can be displayed or printed.)



This update is to report my experience with some non-Canon materials in this printer. The Canon inks (and papers to a lesser degree) are expensive; and we all know this is how the OEMs actually make their money: By selling us supplies. Tempted by the prices, I've tried some other materials. I am now using nothing but Canon inks and paper.



I have used some of the after-market inks sold on Amazon. They worked OK; but the prints just didn't have the snap and zing I was used to. But the show-stopper was this: These after-market ink cartidges constantly (constantly!) clogged, or, if they didn't clog, they produced fine streaks in any areas of the photo with large, constant tone (sky, still water, bokeh areas). These were particularly obnoxious in bokeh areas and sky. I tried all the trouble-shooting and nothing worked consistently. I've (literally) thrown all these away and use nothing but Canon ink now -- with perfect and completely consistent results. I also used some Ilford paper that was OK; but the price difference just didn't justify going away from the Canon Glossy II papers (see links above).



My bottom line: Use nothing but the Canon inks (especially) and paper. They really are worth the money. I had to learn this the hard way.



[update on 4-Apr-2011:] I have now used the profiles on the Red River paper site and, along with some adjustment in Lightroom and help from Scott Kelby's books, I have gotten very nice results with the Red River papers. Well worth a try! Sitck with the Canon inks though.





I'm using the brother HL-2170W wireless laser printer for most print jobs and the Canon PIXMA for photos only. A great combination of printers.



Brother HL-2170W 23ppm Laser Printer with Wireless and Wired Network Interfaces - Large Format - Photo Printer - Canon - Pro 9000'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Photography Book - digital photography, learning


This is my second book in Jim's series. There is so much helpful information and tricks to improving upon your skills. I'm new to photography but this book easy to follow and super helpful for both beginners but more adept photographers. Keep them coming!!!! Improve Your Photography: How Budding Photographers Can Get Pro Results

This is a good resource to keep handy. It's well written, easy to understand. I've enjoyed photography for many years, and think even experienced photographers would do well to follow these common sense tips that really make a difference.

I love this book. It is so easy to read and informative. Great for the hobbist. Gives you appo every beginning setting for any shot, you can of course fine tune but having a starting point at hand is a big plus. Also gives you a "why" for settings and methods, so you can become a better photographer through the understanding of mechanics. I will be buying more books from same author. Honestly, just read it.

I found the book very useful and easy to read. There was just enough technical information in the text to be informative without being overwhelming. I did order the Kindle edition of the book and unfortunately many of the example photos were missing (some were included, but not all). So several of the examples in the book would refer to a picture that was missing. These missing picture are what lead me to rate the book a 4 star instead of 5.

I'm new to photography, so I needed a book that helps me with my technique before I go pro. This book had some parts which I definitely needed to learn. Everything is very well-explained, and I was very pleased with how my first set came out. Definitely buying more from this series.

It was a welcome relief to find a book which was oriented to telling the reader how-to-to-it. It's almost like you and the author are together on a photo shoot and having his help in getting things set-up correctly. Great job!!



Phil. - Learning - Beginners Guide - Digital Photography - Photography Book'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Co Detector - smoke alarm, combination smoke


We have several of them that came with our new house in addition to the 1204 model smoke alarms. They are all problematic. They go through batteries every 6 months and they 'chirp' in the middle of the night. The company is not easy to deal with. Recently all of them went off at the same time at 4 am and there was no smoke or fire... the company says to vacuum them out... easy on 15 foot ceilings?... they are a bad product. I am going to replace them all with a reliable brand. Universal Security Instruments USI-7795 120-Volt AC/DC Wired-In Combination Smoke and Carbon Monoxide Alarm

We kept trying to replace the battery, but it kept chirping intermittently, in the middle of the night, waking up our baby and disrupting world peace. Our world anyway.



Ahhh... just found several reviews of another USI smoke alarm with similar issues. Here's a link to one of them from someone who seems to have found the root of the problem (i.e. they break easily and then start chirping):

http://www.amazon.com/review/RKR39B5B094IL/ref=cm_cr_pr_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B0026T76AU&nodeID=&tag=&linkCode=



Errrrrggh! Dp not buy this detector!

We bought one of these to replace one of our original smoke detectors about 18 months ago. We had to replace the battery every 2 or 3 months which does not make sense, considering the battery is supposed to be a backup for failure of the AC power. The unit has started a single 2 beep chirp which can happen from once every few days to a couple of times a day, not described in the manual. I have vacummed it as recommended, changed batteries, but continue to lose sleep and disconnect the unit in the middle of the night. I am ready to go try another type of unit. We are in summer with absolutely no source of CO in the house, so definitely defective. When searching the web for some help, appears short battery life and chirping is common. These may be cheaper, but if you have to replace them every 12 to 24 months, the apparent savings really turns out to be a much higher cost.

I have several of these unit in my house and they seem like a poor quality item. I suspect the builder used the cheapest detector that would meet code. Incidentally, this seller is asking about 6-7 times what the product should sell for. It should be in the $10-15 dollar range. I am going to switch to a new brand. Hopefully I have more confidence in the First Alert unit.

The price was right on this combo alarm, but the quality is NOT. I installed several of these in my residence in 2008 after a whole house remodel. Every single one of them have failed by now (3 years later). They scared the heck out of everybody by randomly, intermittently alarming in the middle of the night - with increasing frequency - until replacement. Battery changes didn't matter, so it wasn't the cause... Of course, following Murphy's Law, it happened every 2 hours starting the evening I had company from out-of-town staying over. Trashed these and got some Kiddie combo alarms. Much better!

I had 5 of these alarms professionally installed and ganged together. One of the monitors would signal elevated CO levels without any CO-producing equipment running. I moved the bad monitor to different locations and had the same result, one failing monitor. I recommend not purchasing this product.

We had two interlinked USI-7795 combination smoke and CO alarms installed in our home in 2009 during a remodel. When they sounded we evacuated the house and stayed in a hotel for the night. We aired out the house and they were fine the next day. We then had a CO detection company ($$$!) come in and do a CO assessment. No CO anywhere. I rented a highly sensitive detector and when the alarms went off again, I was prepared. Again, no detectable CO with the very expensive and sensitive unit. Replaced these less than two year old defective units with First Alert. I have seen nothing that would convince me to buy USI again. We will see how it goes with the BRK/First Alert units.

I swapped out the USI smoke alarm located in the room with a gas furnace for this smoke and carbon monoxide alarm. In just a few minutes we had added protection if a carbon monoxide situation developed.



The swap of units was easy and trivial.



I did try another brand before the USI and discovered that even though the socket on the other device would plug in, the wiring was different. When the sparks jumped and the smoke came out of the other brand detector, I knew they weren't plug compatible. So if you have USI devices now, this is a nice upgrade for added CO protection. If you have another brand, be careful..... and check the polarity of the leads before assuming that just because the plug fits, the wiring is correct. - Co Detector - Smoke Alarm - Smoke Detector - Combination Smoke'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Digital Slr - d3100, nikon coolpix


<UPDATE> I went out and shot another 200+ photos this morning.

To keep this review readable I will edit out my rant towards those that posted video reviews within days of the release notice of this camera.

A few more notes on thing I've "discovered" while shooting today.

I shot a couple short vids, used flash, turned off the camera multiple times and allowed it to hibernate many times, zoomed in and out and still the camera showed 1/4 of battery life left. Obviously if you're going to use this in a photo rich environment, carry a spare battery. Always better safe than sorry.

Some reviewers said they couldn't find any usable photos using HDR. I found it more than usable and will attach a couple photos to allow comparison.

I was using a grade 6 SD card today. That is the minimum Nikon recommends. It took approximately 13 seconds for the camera to process an HDR photo and a couple more seconds to write it to the card. Camera continues to show practically no lag time when taking standard shots. Only panoramas and HDR slow things down, with HDR certainly taking the longest. Nikon does have a progress bar that appears across the bottom so you don't think the camera is locked up.

While using full (or near full) zoom and in Auto mode, the camera did a fair amount of searching to focus on an item while in MACRO. Since my previous Lumix TZ5 was less than optimal in low light focusing, I am used to using either PROGRAM or Aperture priority on the Nikon to achieve focus on the intended target.

In what i consider "medium light" the camera refused to allow an aperture setting to maintain an narrow field of focus.

I'm certainly not down-grading my rating of the camera. I like it very much.

Just remember it is not a DSLR. In comparison it has a tiny sensor. There are always trade-offs. I am more convinced that this camera will suit my intended uses very well. The VR at extreme zoom still impresses me, as does the low light sensitivity and noise. Yes, there's noise, even at 560 ISO. It's not distracting however. Wait for the camera geeks to test and publish their data (i.e. dpreview.com) to get the hard statistics. My over all impression still stands and I'm glad I took a gamble and pre-ordered this camera and was on the initial round of deliveries from Amazon.

<ORIGINAL POST> I have had possession of my P500 for my second evening to this point.

I've gotten to "play" a bit with it and here are my impressions.

Is it "the perfect camera for everyone?" No.

I personally don't believe such and animal exists nor will likely ever. Important factors to one shooter may be a non-factor or possibly a negative to another.



What is important is for each individual consumer (or gift giver)is consider the features that are most important to you.

Quickly summarizing me and my trigger points:

1)Travel friendly; great for nature shots, scenics, wildlife, architecture and has video capabilities. Do a reasonable job of photographing people when I must.



Size wise, very similar form factor (though a bit smaller)than my previous coolpix 8700. (Though nearly 3 times as thick and heavier than it's immediate predecessor, Panasonic's Lumix TZ5) Unless you have large cargo pockets, this is NOT a pocket-able camera. I have large hands and I find it comfortable to work with with controls placed logically and well. I passed the camera to a female co-worker with small hands and she also felt comfortable handling it, though she didn't take any shots with it. Build quality seems very solid, much more "put together" than comparative Canons that at times strike me as "less solid". My only concern at this point is the thumb rest pad on the right side, above the multi-function button may not hold up to long term usage, but it does appear to be inset, not just a "glue on" so may be fine.



<rant removed> Do a search of "Nikon P500 reviews" and look at the plethora of "reviews" that followed the announcement of release back on Feb 9th.

Find one that shows them actually USING the camera and THEIR photos and not displaying shots provided by Nikon. Don't call them "reviews" Call them "release notices" But, I digress.



I got this so I can become comfortable with it for my upcoming trip to Alaska. I will be asking a lot from it. From what I've seen so far, I believe it's up to the task. Some anticipated usage? Panoramas (this one does nice ones very cleanly and simply in both vertical and horizontal directions. It does horizontal in two flavors, 180 and 360 degrees PLEASE NOTE: you can only do the panorama in full wide angle and can not be in any zoom at all ) Catching wildlife in both stills from great distance and capture in slo-motion. Macro shots of flora and fauna. Along with "conventional" shots of points of interest.



Shots that I've taken to this point (right at 80, testing various preset and user/manual modes and extremes of the camera's range have shown me a few things.

Between the Nikkor lens assembly and the internal processing engine barreling and and pin-cushioning at the two extremes is minimal to non-existent to my eye. Some photos do exhibit loss of detail at the corner edges of the frame, nothing serious unless you're blowing your image up.

Under the USER function, you can set up frequently used settings rather than having to sift through menu options to change settings if you have certain effects you use regularly.

Some (a very few)of my shots appear to be slightly over exposed. Adjusting down .3 to .6 seems to please my eye more. It isn't in all shots and all situations, so let your eye be the judge.



The vibration reduction modes (there are two that minimize operator induced blur) seem to be very effective when taking still shots. Think what you're asking this one pound of engineering to do when you're extended out to an effective 800+mm zoom. Did every shot come out crystal clear? No. I had to cull out maybe every 5th or 6th photo. This was free handing it, using the sharp and clear, tilting 3" display and not the EVF, so it was away from my body and more prone to shake.



I have no plans on printing larger than 8x10's I've printed a couple out at that size and am more than pleased with the results. These were photos taken during normal daylight. Lower light photos blown up to that size will show noise.



I haven't run my camera with ISO's over 800 to this point. I'll get out there and push it's limits more this weekend. So far the noise generated by the camera have been well within acceptable limits for me. I wish the aperture was a touch bigger, but at this price point there is always trade-offs. The wide angle is wide, yet not exhibiting fish-eying.



Color rendering seems to pretty good, though I have seen others photos where there were pretty obvious issues when compared to similar full size sensor DSLR photos. I haven't experienced them and what I did see, can be easily corrected with some doctoring in a photo manipulation program.



In the few videos I have shot, the camera's vibration reduction can't cancel all my shake at full or near full zoom. Again, this is all free hand, when I was more cautious or used the EVF, drawing the camera to my head and making for a more stable platform for shooting, things improved dramatically.



Low light focus and flash images is good in the 10-15 photos taken under such conditions. Low light video hasn't been attempted by me to this point.



There is no ability to attach a filter on the lens nor is there a hot shoe. Regarding the filter, I wish I had the option to attach one if i wished, however it wasn't a deal breaker for me. I'm either shooting, or it's hanging down off my neck, on the ready or if I'm done shooting for a few, I snap the tethered lens cover on. Nikon is quiet clear that the cover must be removed before powering up the camera. The camera is very fast in being ready for the first shot. I don't have a stop watch but it's well under 1/2 second from OFF to ready to focus and shoot. There is virtually no lag time between shots unless the camera is stitching together and processing a panorama shot or a few other situations that are clearly outlined by Nikon and I haven't experimented with as of yet. Nikon wants you to use class 6 SD cards or faster, to keep camera write times down and ability to shoot quick.



If I find something compelling this weekend when I'm out putting it through it's paces, I will update this review with more relevant information. Likewise, should you kind readers have questions I can answer, feel free to inquire and I will do my best to respond.



My overall impression is very positive to this point. I wasn't expecting DSLR results in regards to picture quality and flexibility in various shooting conditions. This camera comes closer on both these aspects than I expected; and I'm carrying a LOT less gear and weight.



Nikon really should provide an external battery charger with the kit. In camera charging takes the camera out of use during the process. Otherwise the only other area I see they really missed the mark was by not adding threads to the lens barrel allowing filters/attachments. Nikon COOLPIX P500 12.1 CMOS Digital Camera with 36x NIKKOR Wide-Angle Optical Zoom Lens and Full HD 1080p Video (Black) - D3100 - Nikon Coolpix - Blueproton - Nikon Dslr'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Facebook - gift card, gift cards


This is the most fun gift,and it it totally easy. My sister found her gift card among her many birthday messages and she loved it. I ordered it weeks ahead of time, and Amazon charges it 2 days before the post date you choose. thanks Amazon for a great fun gift idea. Amazon.com Gift Card - Facebook Delivery

The convenience is great. I've used them in the past and will continue to use them.



I'd love to see some feedback from Amazon when a gift card is initially used. This would give me confirmation that the card is getting used and not lost.

I loved being able to buy something and post it on my friends page with a little message!!! It's a way to say happy b-day on her page, while already giving her a gift - free of hassle!!!! I am definitely doing this again!

I sent an Amazon gift card via facebook. I was a little apprehensive about doing so. It ended working out great. I was able to get my friends gift to her on time and I didn't have to worry about it being in an email that could get put into spam mail. The only thing that would make it better is if I received an email from Amazon telling me the card had received/viewed and when it was redeemed. This was a great option for me and my friend loved receiving it.

My grandchildren grow so fast and it is hard to keep up with their likes and dislikes. I feel real comfortable giving my 14-year old grandson a Amazon gift card because of all the great things Amazon offers. I especially like all the electronics because he is a budding "techie". He also likes to read and I know that he will be easily able to find something he likes at Amazon. Thank goodness for Amazon gift cards!

In the past six months, I have ordered several Amazon gift cards by various methods: e-mail, Facebook and self-printed. They not only make a great last-minute gift, but enable me to check their status. I have done so on three occasions, and each time have had a pleasant result. I was able to monitor their status. The first one was sent as a graduation gift via e-mail. When it was not redeemed for several weeks, I contacted the graduate to remind him. He had not checked that particular e-mail account in some time. He opened the e-mail and redeemed the card the next day. I sent the other two via Facebook, one for a wedding and the other for a 21st birthday. In both cases, the recipients had misfiled the message. I was able to help the bride figure hers out, but I had to re-send the card for the new adult. In that case, the old card was automatically voided and the new card was quickly redeemed. In all cases, happy recipients, with problems easily and safely corrected.

This is the third gift card I have purchased and love the convenience of giving gifts this way. One was a baby gift and two were for Birthdays. All out of state. It sure beats buying something someone does not need. They have the opportunity to shop on Amazon for anything they need or want. The best thing is they get the card immediately, no wrapping or shipping, taxes or other fees. It is an exceptional way to purchase gifts and because Amazon gives access to so many retailers my recipients have endless choices! The only thing that could make this a better way of shopping is to remind the recipient of the card if it hasen't been redeemed in a reasonable amount of time. I have a busy son in Chicago who is always traveling for business he did forget to redeem his card. Thank you Amazon! Janie Bifulco - Amazon Gift Card - Gift Cards - Easy - Gift Card'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


    ,
  • amazon gift card
  • ,
  • gift cards
  • ,
  • gift card
  • ,
  • easy

Smoke Alarms - smoke alarms, combination smoke


I spent a good amount of time in the fire safety aisle of a local store, reading packages and comparing units before selecting this particular one to replace an aging smoke-only alarm. This one has two different-sounding alarms (3 beeps for fire and 4 beeps for carbon monoxide) and runs on 2-AA batteries. The batteries can be replaced without taking the unit off the ceiling and the compartment won't close without batteries in it. I installed it by myself in just a couple of minutes with a pencil, drill, hammer and flathead screwdriver. It has several features I chose not to use, most involve locking systems to prevent tampering, but it is nice that they are offered. Also has a photoelectric sensor claiming to prevent false alarms from food smoke and shower steam. I think it's a great value for my family's safety.



**(12/20/08)**I would like to amend my review. A week after installing, the alarm started "chirping" 3 times at irregular intervals (once at 4:00am Sunday, then Tuesday at 1:30pm). I changed the batteries after a third incident (again in the early morning) and it was fine for another four days. The next time I took it down and noticed the back indicates the 3 "chirps" is to replace the alarm. I have had the thing less than a month and have to replace it already?!?!? What a CROCK!



**(12/22/08)**I called and spoke to a rep from First Alert on the phone who explained to me the unit runs a self-test every 90 seconds and if it fails, the alarm 'chirps'. He asked me a few questions and promised me a new unit in a week to ten days.



**(1/14/09)** I received a new unit in the mail today, hard to install with my fingers crossed.



**(3/3/09)**Another malfunctioning alarm, at five o'clock in the morning. I am through with this junk!! Buy only if you want to replace every 4-6 weeks. First Alert SC05CN Battery Operated Combination Carbon Monoxide/Smoke Alarm

I needed to replace a couple very old smoke detectors and decided to upgrade to a smoke and carbon dioxide detector. One of the problems with old smoke detectors is they use 9volt batteries which also are difficult to replace as well as expensive. This new First Alert dual smoke and carbon dioxide detector uses 2 AA batteries and has a separate battery compartment which allows you to replace the battery without taking the detector off the ceiling. Cheaper batteries and much easier to replace them. The cost at Amazon was only $30 and nicely cheaper than anywhere. All-around good service from Amazon. Very satisfied customer here.

I have rental properties and I decided to upgrade all units to have monoxide detectors. I decided on this unit because it is a two in one device and it used double AA batteries instead of the nine volts. My tenants keep complaining that these devices keep beeping. I looked on the back and 3 chirps = bad detector. I took a few of them down, put up the old ones and brought them to my home. They have not chirped since. Something about the other place is making these detectors fail.



Another thing is that I did not notice this but there is a 5 year life on these detectors and then they will chirp without any choice but to replace them. So even if yours works at first, you only will get 5 years out of it. I bought a total of 7 of these that cost me a few hundred and now I need to look for replacements. I wish I left all the old smoke detectors in.

Of course, First Alert is known for quality products, but this device is better yet. Very easy to install, easy to maintain (uses double A instead of 9 volt), relatively inexpensive and sounds an alarm shrill enough to wake up my 10 year old dog. Buy it!

Bought and installed one of these in my upstairs hallway.



Within 3 months of installation, the alarm began intermittently emitting the "3 rapid chirps" alarm, which means that the entire unit is bad and must be replaced. Extremely unreliable!

Like many other reviewers, the four that I bought are having intermittent spells of the dreaded "three chirps". Not sure what brings it on, but it seems to invariably happen in the middle of the night. Extremely annoying.

I bought two of these last year. Within a few months, we started getting false alarms. Three chirps in a row. Sometimes they would stop on their own. Other times, I would have to take them down, take out the batteries, and hang it up again later.



Each time, I tested the batteries. Each time, they were fine. I ever replaced the batteries a couple of times, just to be sure.



Don't buy these. They'll drive you to drink.

One month in place and have same 3 chirp problem. Company sending replacement, but now I expect problem to recur. Very disappointed because I bought 2 devices based on Consumer Reports recommendation for effectiveness. My model is SC501CN. Bought 4 smoke detectors too (SA302CN) and think one or two has same chirp problem. - Carbon Monoxide - Co - Combination Smoke - Smoke Alarms'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


School Supplies - plastic folders, folder accessories


I needed folders for the first day of school and wanted something more sturdy than the cardboard homework folders we've used in the past. These are reasonable for the price, you get 12 folders, but the plastic is very thin and flimsy, almost totally transparent, and I'm not sure that they will hold up any better than the cardboard ones. However they are easy to use and an nice color range. They are the classic oxford twin pocket format.



Edited to add - 3 months later I'm eating my words, these folders have stood up far better than cardboard ones. The cardboard ones would be disintergrating by now and these look as good as the first day I opened them. So despite being thin, they seem to do the trick! And my son loves that they are almost transparent and he always knows what's in them and can't forget things... So def would order again, should need arise... Filexec 3120, 2 Pocket Folder, Letter Size, Frosted, Set of 12 in 6 Assorted Colors , 2 Each Blueberry, Strawberry, Grape, Lime, Lemon, Tangerine

I have now ordered mult. of these folders. Some for my kids and some for myself after trying them out w/ my 13 year old. They are thin, but very durable. I like the thinness as it allows for punch holes to accommodate a three ring binder. The colors are vibrant. I like to color code things, so with so many choices, it makes it easy to spot the one I want. - Plastic Folders - Folder Accessories - Oxford Twin Pocked - Project Folders'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Helicopters


I have a small squadron of mini helicopters and this one is by far the best so far. I read great reviews of the Syma S107. I was quite pleased with it compared to some of the older Syma models. Then I saw the positive reviews for this and thought I would give it a go. It flies incredibly well! Quiter than the other seven helicopters I have and so stable, smooth, and responsive. It is a little slow with forward and reverse momentum, but not bad. Slow is easier to control...maybe that was intentional. We fly these every day in the office and this hands down outperforms everthing else.

For those comparing models, here you go:

Syma S109 Apache- Excellent

Syma S105G (Sport Helicopter) Very Good -Fastest, stable, but somewhat loud, durable metal frame

Syma S107G- (Sport Helicopter) Very good- nearly identical to S105 but a little slower, different scheme,older?

Syma S026 Chinook- Looks cool, flies ok, but hard to control. Too much power for its weight; 'Cieling magnet'

Syma S013 Black Hawk- Horrible! Very light, spins uncontrollably, fragile

Syma S013 Apache- See S013 Black Hawk review. (friend purchased this one to join the fun: nothing but regrets)



Heard the S108G Cobra is good too but haven't tried it. My deployment to Iraq is almost over, so I probably won't be buying any more toys. Syma S109G Apache AH-64 3-Channels Mini Indoor Helicopter

What a difference a gyro makes! Incredible...I tried one of the 1st gen micro R/C copters (no gyro on those) not long after they came out, and found them to be extremely difficult to control and not much fun because of it.



This generation with the gyro is just amazing though...SO stable, SO easy - but not boring. There is still a learning curve for complete R/C noobies that will make this a great first R/C copter, but I look at it almost like a challenge...trying to master this little beast is FUN!



This also actually looks like a real helicopter, compared to the ones I bought previously, which looked like....well like R/C copters - completely unrealistic.



The LED lights are awesome so you can fly at night (my kids LOVE that - the dog...not so much), and the thing even seems to behave like a real helicopter, with ground effect and having to reduce speed (thrust?) to tilt forward (I am no pilot or physicist, but I do know that the previous models I tried did not give me any kind of sense of "this thing FEELS like I am flying a real helicopter!")



Gonna stop now because I sound like I work for the company (not even sure who the company is actually, but whoever it is, they sorely need an English native to write the English part of the instruction manual!)



Can't recommend this enough. Easy easy 5 stars.



FYI if you are interested in modding your Syma (specifically, the cheap, easy and awesome tail rotor mod that makes it faster and more agile), you should buy the model that looks like the R/C copter (107G I believe). Found this out the hard way, but I still prefer this one for the looks. Video of the mod results: [...]

I own two other indoor helicopters that I purchased for three to four times as much money at the mall. This is the helicopter that has the best control out of all of them. I can land this thing on a soda can and fly circles around my wives head (my favorite part, especially when she is watching stupid tv shows like the Kardashians). This is the absolute best gift for any male you know. My 8 year old can fly it. Cant say enough about what you get for the price. I also love the silly Engwish warnings printed on the props.

Got two of these RC helicopters, the other being the "Military Gyro Mini Indoor Helicopter Viefly V268". This one is by far the easier to control. I'm actually going to return the latter... it's impossible to stabalize, when it connects with the controller at all.



It was my younger one's 5th birthday gift, but figured he and his 6-year old brother would fight over them, and questioned the durability in the hands of 5/6 year olds, so got two. We did fly them outside -- there wasn't much wind -- and after 10 minutes or so they actually got pretty good at hovering and basic controls. They did bang them into several things inside and not too much damage to the blades.



Very big hit for a gift, seems like excellent value for $20, especially when you can get two for basically the price of one at Walmart.

This is a smooth operating helicopter. I am a beginner and I was flying this copter like a pro the very first time, it is just that easy to control. Before buying I did the research read the reviews and it turned out to be a very good choice. I bought the Gyro Star S107, and the S108G Cobra the same time that I bought the S109G Apache and I like them all. You cannot go wrong with this copter.

The Syma S109G Apache I received shipped quick and was very easy to fly. It flies better than the S107 Syma that I have and it's also a lot quieter. I would recommend this model to anyone looking for a great entry level RC helicopter.

Great little indoor Heelo. Fun, reliable, sturdy. Crashed it dozens of times with no ill affects. Beware laptop charging! If your laptop is set to sleep after non-use, the Heelo may not charge. Seems like several people are having this issue without knowing it. I use a dedicated USB charger plugged in to the wall. Works GR8...

This toy is one of the funnest and most durable RC helicopters I've ever owned and had a chance to experience. I didn't have to make any adjustments to the trim. This helicopter is very stable and way better than the RC helicopters I've previously owned from other companies. This is a really fun and durable toy!

This is my 3rd Syma Heli, and another example of a perfectly-flying micro coaxial heli that works flawlessly out of the box. Hovers like it's hanging from a string, very steady, nice forward and reverse flight. I can't say that for most other inexpensive micro heli's out there, but this thing is as good as, if not better than, a $100 Blade MCx micro heli. Great Apache scale looks, a nice gift for any RC helicopter enthusiast. Quite durable, can smack it into walls and ceilings without breaking it.



A great buy, perfect gift for anyone into RC heli's or planes. Excellent for indoor flight, can easily maneuver through small rooms. Best heli in this price range, by a long shot, I'd say that it's better than most coaxial heli's at 3-4x the cost.



One of the best features of the S019G is the horrible Chinese-English Warning translation on the blades: "If blade damage, don't be fly. otherwise it will create the human body or blame damage". Classic.'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Helicopters Helicopters Helicopters

Wireless Printer - photo printer, multifunction printer


So got this printer for the wife for Christmas. Great printer slick has everything I need in a printer...... Except and endless supply of ink. I literally printed of 2 photos and test papers and a passport application. I looked at the ink levels and the yellow and cyan are running REALLY low for that amount of printing.



I will say that the photos are FANTASTIC and even went as far as to buy the great quality paper. The printer pictures are SUPER clear and great quality.



The wireless capabilities makes it easy for me to place this where ever I want and not have to take up space around my desk. Did find I had to remove the back plate for it to feed paper correctly from the back feeder.



All in all a good printer but waiting to see what the ink costs will be. I will keep you updated. Canon PIXMA MG6120 Wireless Inkjet Photo All-In-One Printer (4503B002)

Canon has done such an amazing job with this printer, not only performance wise, but also on quality, design and ease of use. I used to own a Canon MP500, but later needed a wireless printer. I was recommended to get an HP because of their good reputation, larger ink cartridges, and lower cost to maintain - which to an extent was true, ink on the HP lasted me about 6-months compered to the MP500's 3-4 months, and the HP ink also cost less. In reality, who cares how much the ink cost, when the HP was the noisiest thing in my office, slower than snail-mail (exaggerating), and it printed the most horrible images and documents. ...or maybe it was just me since I had already experienced what Canon was capable of.



I am really happy I purchased the Canon MG6120. Within the last month, I've purchased a MacBook Air, iMac, Time Capsule and HP Media Server, and all I can say is that I really don't care about those gadgets, I'm simply super excited about my printer purchase - it is by far the best printer I have ever used - it't print quality is on par with the thousand dollar printers my company purchases for media services.



Installation was a breeze, it's just a matter of unpacking the printer, removing all the wrap on it, aligning the print heads, and using it's cool mini LCD to input my wireless network info. Once that's done, simply insert the driver CD into the computer and follow the on-screen instructions (pretty much just click "next" over and over after telling it it's a wireless setup. The only thing that I found a bit annoying was that I had to install using the CD on all 3 of my computers, where on the HP I just had to install one one computer, and after than all the other computers could find it on the network. I might be missing something, so it might be my fault and not Canon's - I'm no network expert. I have been able to get Canon app to work from the iPad; it's only good for pictures though.



Those of you needing high print quality will not be one bit disappointed with this printer. The scanner also works really well, I've already used it to send scans to my computer, and to make photo copies. After creating a photocopy, several people had issues trying to determine which was the original document, which did have an actual pen-written signature.

I needed to replace the printer I was using since I enter photo shows and submit photos to a stock agency I needed excellant results. After shopping around for along time I decided to purchase the Pixma. I was not disappointed. I am now getting top quality prints, lab quality. The only quirk I noticed was that until you break the printer in, you tend to use more ink; but after replacing the cartridges once, that has settled down to normal usage. Great product Canon.

This printer prints great...no problem with quality, connectivity, etc. BUT WOW....a few pages and you're buying $70.00 worth of ink in little ink tanks that have LED's built into them--totally unnecessary. This replaced my previous PIXMA printer which actually did pretty good on ink. These tiny little cartridges essentially evaporate within a few pages. So go buy 6 of them? RIGHT!!! Don't be fooled!! Buy something else!! - Multifunction Printer - Canon - Wireless Printer - Photo Printer'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Rotary Tool Accessories


This set of 20 bits costs less than one high-quality diamond bit from other sources, and the bits did the job for which they were purchased.



Used them to drill two 1/8 inch diameter holes in non-tempered window glass. This must be done slowly to avoid overheating and possibly fracturing the glass. Used several different bits to change shapes in the hope of making it go faster. When done, the holes were fine and all of the bits still seemed to have their abrasive surfaces.



I've read elsewhere that a high-quality diamond bit will last for perhaps three holes like these, and that it takes about two minutes to make one hole. Well, it took about 30 minutes per hole, but more than half of that time was spent pausing to let the glass and bit cool off. Since all of the bits still have diamond grit on them, it seems likely that they'll be able to make several more holes before wearing out.



NOTE: Tempered glass probably will shatter if drilled. This window didn't have a "tempered" logo in the corner and looked normal when viewed through polarized sunglasses. Pro-Quality 20-Piece Diamond-Point Bit Set for Rotary Tool - Glass, Stone, Ceramic

These generic diamond point bits work great on my dremel rotary tool and the price for 20 of them is cheaper than buying 1 bit of the dremel brand. I use them for engraving on glass and they have been great.

One of these diamond tipped bits will run you between $8.00 - $10.00 at any retail or hardware store. This set has every bit for any project you could think of and the power to handle almost any material. It is definately worth the money. Works great on glass, metal, and stone.

I am very very satisfied.

The drill bits worked fine on soft materials such as seashells as long as I didn't put too much pressure on the bit. But on harder materials such as ceramic or stone, the diamond coating wore off very quickly, rendering the bit useless. And yes, I did use lubricant.

These bits were purchased primarily for drilling sea glass for jewelry making. Since this was my first attempt at such a project, I didn't want to spend a lot of money experimenting.



I'm still trying these out, but so far, so good. I like having the variety to play with. I am using these with a Dremel and they work great. I have no complaints.'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information


Rotary Tool Accessories Rotary Tool Accessories Rotary Tool Accessories

Training - gps watch, gps


I consider myself a beginner when it comes to running. After looking around for several options, I decided to get the Polar RS300X G1 because of its multisport capabilities. I could easily run or ride my bike with it, and I would be able to measure distance and pace with the same device, without having to install/uninstall things to my bike every time I wanted to change excersices. After considering the Garmin 305 I decided to go for the Polar because of the extremely big and uncomfortable size of the Garmin. Everything looked nice in the website, but the story changed after only a few weeks I've owned the training computer.

1) The watch itself is incapable of transmitting data to the Polar site (or any other running website) which makes it a little boring for you as a user to log in and "manually" enter your data every time you complete an excersise. I was very sad to know that in order to do this automatically I have to separately purchase an extra device (Polar Flowlink @ $55.00).

2) I have been experiencing some problems with the accuracy of the distance. Since I just got my watch a few weeks ago, I entered in several forums to see if any other user was experiencing what I was going through, and to my unpleaseant surprise, yes... they were. Basically, the battery life of the G1 GPS Sensor is so short that you can only use it for up to 8 hours. More than that and you will start getting incorrect data from your runs. What is the purpose of a GPS sensor if you can get accurate data from it? Now I will have to constantly purchase batteries just to keep my distances correct.



Very sad that Polar hasn't come with better solutions for this issues. I saw several users unhappy about this same thing in their own web site. Polar RS300X G1 Heart Rate Monitor Watch with G1 GPS Sensor (Orange)

I love this thing! The custom zones are great. Had my zones and VO2 levels tested at the gym and my trainer was able to set the watch to MY zones. This also allows me to see a more accurate calorie count.



A couple notes that didn't keep me from giving it 5 stars, but just to keep in mind:



1. The orange is MUCH brighter than on my screen. Think, street construction cone orange. It's much more neon orange.



2. The G1 GPS Sensor is AWESOME on most days. I recently ran with it on a very cloudy/rainy day and it completely lost track of the signal. I haven't used the footpod, so can't compare, but I may end up buying it for use on cloudy days.

I bought this watch about six months ago and have been pretty happy overall with its performance. I also bought the Flowlink along with the watch (and GPS arm band), but I have yet to use it because of the hassle of downloading the Polar software from its website. Even without being to download my workouts, I still take pleasure in using the watch and GPS. It has been invaluable to know what my pace and distance have been, although I'm not sure if the speeds, and therefore distances, are totally accurate. I say this because I have run with my boyfriend who has a Garmin with built in GPS and his watch says that we're going slower than mine does. Regardless, it gives me an idea of where I'm at.



The only issues that I have had with the watch have been one, if you accidentally hit your arm against something while not intending to exercise, you can start the timer. Two, while running in lightly wooded areas (big paths cut between fairly dense trees) the watch will lose satellite connection and will beep at you until it finds them again. I have found that turning the GPS off and then back on again seems to work. Of course, you have to stop and fumble around with it, but that's what it is. Issue three is the fact that the chest belt transmitter sometimes loses the ability to "talk" to the watch while working out. I have found that before each workout, one really needs to wipe down the chest strap (warm water) before starting. Like the instructions say, the strap needs to be moistened before working out anyhow, but a good wipedown is essential to have uninterrupted transmission for the duration of your workout.

First this watch and GPS can work very well. The GPS can report extremely accurate distances and can on occasion perform well in lightly wooded areas.



But, the watch/GPS gets completely confused about 25% of the time. The manual says that you should let the watch find your HR before you turn on the GPS. Once you turn on the GPS it seems to takes a minute or so for the GPS to find Satellites. (I have not timed this....perhaps it is an extremely annoying 20 seconds, I just know I am ready to go but am standing around in my driveway waiting for my watch) "So, why not just turn on the GPS a bit before I am ready?" you may ask. Well, I have NEVER gotten it to work any way other than standing outside well away from my house, with the watch entirely ready to go other than the GPS and then turning the GPS on last. Assuming you do that you have a decent chance that it will work. If the watch starts complaining about the GPS once you are a good ways down the road there is probably about a 50/50 chances you are out of luck for the day. Sometimes it has just lost the Satellites. Lose of satellite it usually recovers from this fairly quickly and the lose will probably not effect your total distance. However, if your watch wants you to check the GPS it is done for the day. When I do check the GPS, the GPS indicates that it is on and is tracking satellites but the watch continues to be periodically unhappy with it. Sometimes will continue to track your pace reasonably well. You may also be encouraged to see your total distance increasing. This probably means your moving away from your starting point. If you are on a closed coarse, by the time you get back to your starting point your total distance is zero. If this is a coarse you know, then I suppose this is no great loss, except why did you spend so much money on a watch with GPS.



Also, you must let the watch know if it should or should not be expecting a GPS sensor. This is a global setting. I think it would make much more sense for this setting to be associate with the exercise. I have tried to use the watch with different exercises. (e.g. jogging / resistance training / stationary bike) I don't really wanna wear the GPS unless I am jogging. But, the use must change both the exercise and the S-Sensor setting separately. I suppose which way is better is a matter of opinion. I can also see where this complaint on my part might be considered whining. But, I think most users who would be notably impacted would be happier with the S-Sensor seeing associated with the exercise. As a software engineer if I can do a little extra work to save users a handful of seconds everyday, I do it. I consider that fact Polar did not, a sign of apathy and complacency. I have similar feeling about the apparent fickle startup procedure for the GPS.



Finally, I trust the watches calorie approximation very little. If you set your VO2Max manually instead of trusting the watches test it does get closer to every other reference I have used as a baseline for comparison. Since I didn't know mine, I self tested using the Rockport test and if you are having a good GPS day the Rockport test is easy to perform. In any case I feel the Rockport test is destined to give much better results than the at rest test Polar performs. It seems to me that building in a Rockport test in addition to the at rest test would have been ideal for a company that would enjoy selling more GPS units. They may have very good reasons for not doing so, but reading between the lines, I again find myself assuming it to be a sign of apathy and complacency.



The watch is still a cute toy and I am not exactly throwing it away, but I can't help but feel I could have gotten a better value elsewhere and were it more than a toy to me, I would be replacing it. - Polar Rs300x - Gps Watch - Garmin - Gps'


Detail Products
Detail Reviews
Click here for more information